I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at . Document: draft-ietf-pim-3810bis-10 Reviewer: Russ Housley Review Date: 2024-05-24 IETF LC End Date: 2024-06-05 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Almost Ready Major Concerns: Section B.2: The list of changes should talk about the change of the Reserved field to the Flags field. Minor Concerns: Section 7.4: The last sentence says: SSM-aware routers SHOULD ignore MLDv1 Report and DONE messages that contain multicast addresses in the SSM address, SHOULD NOT use such Reports to establish IP forwarding state, and MAY log an error if it receives such a message. I think "SSM address" is supposed to be "SSM address range". Nits: Section 1: s/defined in [RFC4607]/defined in [RFC4607]./ Section 5.2.1: s/The Reserved field are/s/The Reserved field is/ Section 7.4.1 and Section 7.4.2: The other tables from RFC 3810 were reformatted. Why not this one too? Section 8.2.1: s/SSM range/SSM address range/ Section B.2: s/changes made since RFC 3810./changes made since [RFC3810]./