Subject: RE: [Dime] Mail regarding draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis

From: "Glen Zorn" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:18:50 +0700

Glen Zorn [mailto://[email-masked]] writes:

...

> > My apologies, I was mistakingly believing that the previous
> discussions
> > on this topic had lead to the adoption of Route-Record AVPs in
> answers.
> 
> I'm not at all sure that you were mistaken about that, but no such
> decision
> has been reflected in the draft.

Sorry, I should have been more specific: what I _meant_ was "reflected in
RFC3588bis".

..