Owen, Justification
The doctrine of Justification by Faith,
through the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ;
explained, confirmed, and vindicated
by John Owen
Search the Scriptures--John 5:29
Contents
Prefatory Note
To the Reader
General Considerations, previous unto the Explanation of the
Doctrine of Justification
First, The general nature of justification--State of the person to
be justified antecedently thereunto, Rom.4:5; 3:19; 1:32;
Gal.3:10; John 3:18,36; Gal.3:22--The sole inquiry on that
state--Whether it be any thing that is our own inherently, or
what is only imputed unto us, that we are to trust unto for
our acceptance with God--The sum of this inquiry--The proper
ends of teaching and learning the doctrine of justification--
Things to be avoided therein
Secondly, A due consideration of God, the Judge of all, necessary
unto the right stating and apprehension of the doctrine of
justification, Rom.8:33; Isa.43:25; 45:25; Ps.143:2; Rom.3:20-
-What thoughts will be ingenerated hereby in the minds of men,
Isa.33:14; Micah 6:6,7; Isa.6:5--The plea of Job against his
friends, and before God, not the same, Job 40:3-5, 43:406--
Directions for visiting the sick given of old--Testimonies of
Jerome and Ambrose--Sense of men in their prayers, Dan.9:7,18;
Ps.143:2, 130:3,4--Paraphrase of Austin on that place--Prayer
of Pelagius--Public liturgies
Thirdly, A due sense of our apostasy from God, the depravation of
our nature thereby, with the power and guilt of sin, the
holiness of the law, necessary unto a right understanding of
the doctrine of justification--Method of the apostle to this
purpose, Rom.1,2,3-- Grounds of the ancient and present
Pelagianism, in the denial of these things--Instances thereof-
-Boasting of perfection from the same ground--Knowledge of sin
and grace mutually promote each other
Fourthly, Opposition between works and grace, as unto justification-
-Method of the apostle, in the Epistle to the Romans, to
manifest this opposition--A scheme of others contrary
thereunto--Testimonies witnessing this opposition--Judgment to
be made on them--Distinctions whereby they are evaded--The
uselessness of them--Resolution of the case in hand by
Bellarmine, Dan.9:18; Luke 17:10
Fifthly, A commutation as unto sin and righteousness, by
imputation, between Christ and believers, represented in the
Scripture--The ordinance of the scapegoat, Lev.16:21,22--The
nature of expiatory sacrifices, Lev.4:29, etc.--Expiation of
an uncertain murder, Deut.21:1-9--The commutation intended
proved and vindicated, Isa.53:5,6; 2 Cor.5:21; Rom.8:3,4;
Gal.3:13,14; 1 Pet.2:24; Deut.21:23--Testimonies of Justin
Martyr, Gregory Nyseen, Augustine, Chrysostom, Bernard,
Taulerus, Pighius, to that purpose--The proper actings of
faith with respect thereunto, Rom.5:11; Matt.11:28; Ps.38:4;
Gen.4:13; Isa.53:11; Gal.3:1; Isa.45:22; John 3:14,15--A bold
calumny answered
Sixthly, Introduction of grace by Jesus Christ into the whole of
our relation unto God, and its respect unto all the parts of
our obedience--No mystery of grace in the covenant of works--
All religion originally commensurate unto reason--No notions
of natural light concerning the introduction of the mediation
of Christ and mystery of grace, into our relation to God,
Eph.1:17-19--Reason, as corrupted, can have no notions of
religion but what are derived from its primitive state--Hence
the mysteries of the gospel esteemed folly--Reason, as
corrupted, repugnant unto the mystery of grace--Accommodation
of spiritual mysteries unto corrupt reason, wherefore
acceptable unto many--Reasons of it--Two parts of corrupted
nature's repugnancy unto the mystery of the gospel:--1. That
which would reduce it unto the private reason of men--Thence
the Trinity denied, and the incarnation of the Son of God;
without which the doctrine of justification cannot stand--Rule
of the Socinians in the interpretation of the Scripture--2.
Want of a due comprehension of the harmony that is between all
the parts of the mystery of grace--This harmony proved--
Compared with the harmony in the works of nature--To be
studied--But it is learned only of them who are taught of God;
and in experience--Evil effects of the want of a due
comprehension hereof--Instances of them--All applied unto the
doctrine of justification
Seventhly, General prejudices against the imputation of the
righteousness of Christ: --1. That it is not in terms found in
the Scripture, answered--2. That nothing is said of it in the
writings of the evangelists, answered, John 20:30,31--Nature
of Christ's personal ministry--Revelations by the Holy Spirit
immediately from Christ--Design of the writings of the
evangelists--3. Differences among Protestants themselves about
this doctrine, answered--Sense of the ancients herein--What is
of real difference among Protestants, considered
Eighthly, Influence of the doctrine of justification into the first
Reformation--Advantages unto the world by that Reformation--
State of the consciences of men under the Papacy, with respect
unto justification before God--Alterations made therein by the
light of this doctrine, though not received--Alterations in
the Pagan unbelieving world by the introduction of
Christianity--Design and success of the first reformers herein-
-Attempts for reconciliation with the Papists in this
doctrine, and their success--Remainders of the ignorance of
the truth in the Roman church--Unavoidable consequences of the
corruption of this doctrine
I. Justifying faith; the causes and object of it declared
Justification by faith generally acknowledged--The meaning of
it perverted--The nature and use of faith in justification
proposed to consideration--Distinctions about it waived--A
twofold faith of the gospel expressed in the Scripture--Faith
that is not justifying, Acts 8:13; John 2:23,24; Luke 8:13;
Matt.7:22,23--Historical faith; whence it is so called, and
the nature of it--Degrees of assent in it--Justification not
ascribed unto any degree of it--A calumny obviated--The causes
of true saving faith--Conviction of sin previous unto it--The
nature of legal conviction, and its effects--Arguments to
prove it antecedent unto faith--Without the consideration of
it, the true nature of faith not to be understood--The order
and relation of the law and gospel, Rom.1:17--Instance of Adam-
-Effects of conviction--Internal: Displicency and sorrow; fear
of punishment; desire of deliverance--External: Abstinence
from sin; performance of duties; reformation of life--Not
conditions of justification; not formal disposition unto it;
not moral preparations for it--The order of God in
justification--The proper object of justifying faith--Not all
divine verity equally; proved by sundry arguments--The pardon
of our own sins, whether the first object of faith--The Lord
Christ in the work of mediation, as the ordinance of God for
the recovery of lost sinners, the proper object of justifying
faith--The position explained and proved, Acts 10:43; 16:31;
4:12; Luke 24:25-27; John 1:12; 3:16,36; 6:29,47; 7:38; Acts
26:18; Col.2:6; Rom.3:24,25; 1 Cor.1:30; 2 Cor.5:21;
Eph.1:7,8; 2 Cor.5:19
II. The nature of justifying faith
The nature of justifying faith in particular, or of faith
in the exercise of it, whereby we are justified--The heart's
approbation of the way of the justification and salvation of
sinners by Christ, with its acquiescency therein--The
description given, explained and confirmed:--1. From the
nature of the gospel--Exemplified in its contrary, or the
nature of unbelief, Prov.1:30; Heb.2:3; 1 Pet.2:7; 1
Cor.1:23,24; 2 Cor.4:3--What it is, and wherein it does
consist.--2. The design of God in and by the gospel--His own
glory his utmost end in all things--The glory of his
righteousness, grace, love, wisdom, etc.--The end of God in
the way of the salvation of sinners by Christ, Rom.3:25; John
3:16; 1 John 3:16; Eph.1:5,6; 1 Cor.1:24; Eph.3:10; Rom.1:16;
4:16; Eph.3:9; 2 Cor.4:6--3. The nature of faith thence
declared--Faith alone ascribes and gives this glory to God.--
4. Order of the acts of faith, or the method in believing--
Convictions previous thereunto--Sincere assent unto all divine
revelations, Acts 26:27--The proposal of the gospel unto that
end, Rom.10:11-17; 2 Cor.3:18,etc.--State of persons called to
believe--Justifying faith does not consist in any one single
habit or act of the mind or will--The nature of that about
which is the first act of faith--Approbation of the way of
salvation by Christ, comprehensive of the special nature of
justifying faith--What is included there in:--1. A
renunciation of all other ways, Hos.14:2,3; Jer.3:23;
Ps.71:16; Rom.10:3.--2. Consent of the will unto this way,
John 14:6--3. Acquiescency of the heart in God, 1 Pet.1:21.--
4. Trust in God.--5. Faith described by trust--The reason of
it--Nature and object of this trust inquired into--A double
consideration of special mercy--Whether obedience be included
in the nature of faith, or be of the essence of it--A sincere
purpose of universal obedience inseparable from faith--How
faith alone justifies--Repentance, how required in and unto
justification--How a condition of the new covenant--
Perseverance in obedience is so also--Definitions of faith
III. The use of faith in justification; its especial object
farther cleared
Use of faith in justification; various conceptions about it--
By whom asserted as the instrument of it; by whom denied--In
what sense it is affirmed so to be--The expressions of the
Scripture concerning the use of faith in justification; what
they are, and how they are best explained by an instrumental
cause--Faith, how the instrument of God in justification--How
the instrument of them that do believe--The use of faith
expressed in the Scripture by apprehending, receiving;
declared by an instrument--Faith, in what sense the condition
of our justification--Signification of that term, whence to be
learned
IV. Of justification; the notion and signification of the
Word in Scripture
The proper sense of these words, justification, and to
justify, considered--Necessity thereof--Latin derivation of
justification--Some of the ancients deceived by it --From
"jus", and "justum"; "justus filius", who--The Hebrew
"hitsdik"--Use and signification of it--Places where it is
used examined, 2 Sam.15:4; Deut.25:1; Prov.17:15; Isa.5:23;
50:8,9; 1 Kings 8:31,32; 2 Chron.6:22,23; Ps.82:3; Exod.23:7;
Job 27:5; Isa.53:11; Gen.44:16; Dan.12:3--The constant sense
of the word evinced--"Diakaio-oo", use of it in other authors,
to punish--What it is in the New Testament, Matt.11:19; 12:37;
Luke 7:29; 10:29; 16:15; 18:14; Acts 13:38,39; Rom.2:13; 3:4--
Constantly used in a forensic sense--Places seeming dubious,
vindicated, Rom.8:30; 1 Cor.6:11; Tit.3:5-7; Rev.22:11--How
often these words, "diakaio-oo" and "dikaioumai", are used in
the New Testament--Constant sense of this--The same evinced
from what is opposed unto it, Isa.1:8,9; Prov.17:15;
Rom.5:116,18; 8:33,34--And the declaration of it in terms
equivalent, Rom.4:6,11; 5:9,10; 2 Cor.5:20,21; Matt.1:21; Acts
13:39; Gal.2:16, etc.--Justification in the Scripture,
proposed under a juridical scheme, and of a forensic title--
The parts and progress of it--Inferences from the whole
Distinction of a first and second justification--The whole
doctrine of the Roman church concerning justification grounded
on this distinction--The first justification, the nature and
causes of it, according unto the Romanists--The second
justification, what it is in their sense--Solution of the
seeming difference between Paul and James, falsely pretended
by this distinction--The same distinction received by the
Socinians and others--The latter termed by some the continuation
of our justification--The distinction disproved--Justification
considered, either as unto its essence or its manifestation--
The manifestation of it twofold, initial and final--Initial is
either unto ourselves or others--No second justification hence
ensues--Justification before God, legal and evangelical--Their
distinct natures--The distinction mentioned derogatory to the
merit of Christ--More in it ascribed unto ourselves than unto
the blood of Christ, in our justification--The vanity of
disputations to this purpose--All true justification
overthrown by this distinction--No countenance given unto this
justification in the Scripture--The second justification not
intended by the apostle James--Evil of arbitrary distinctions-
-Our first justification so described in the Scripture as to
leave no room for a second--Of the continuation of our
justification; whether it depend on faith alone, or our
personal righteousness, inquired--Justification at once
completed, in all the causes and effects of it, proved at
large--Believers, upon their justification, obliged unto
perfect obedience--The commanding power of the law constitutes
the nature of sin in them who are not obnoxious unto its curse-
-Future sins, in what sense remitted at our first
justification--The continuation of actual pardon, and thereby
of a justified estate; on what it does depend--Continuation of
justifications the act of God; whereon it depends in that
sense--On our part, it depends on faith alone--Nothing
required hereunto but the application of righteousness imputed-
-The continuation of our justification is before God--That
whereon the continuation of our justification depends,
pleadable before God--This not our personal obedience, proved:-
-1. By the experience of all believers--2. Testimonies of
Scripture--3. Examples--The distinction mentioned rejected
VI. Evangelical personal righteousness, the nature and use of
it-- Final judgment, and its respect unto justification
Evangelical personal righteousness; the nature and use of it--
Whether there be an angelical justification on our evangelical
righteousness, inquired into--How this is by some affirmed and
applauded--Evangelical personal righteousness asserted as the
condition of our righteousness, or the pardon of sin--Opinion
of the Socinians--Personal righteousness required in the
gospel--Believers hence denominated righteous--Not with
respect unto righteousness habitual, but actual only--Inherent
righteousness the same with sanctification, or holiness--In
what sense we may be said to be justified by inherent
righteousness--No evangelical justification on our personal
righteousness--The imputation of the righteousness of Christ
does not depend thereon--None have this righteousness, but
they are antecedently justified--A charge before God, in all
justification before God--The instrument of this charge, the
law or the gospel--From neither of them can we be justified by
this personal righteousness--The justification pretended
needless and useless--It has not the nature of any
justification mentioned in the Scripture, but is contrary to
all that is so called--Other arguments to the same purpose--
Sentential justification at the last day--Nature of the last
judgement--Who shall be then justified --A declaration of
righteousness, and an actual admission into glory, the whole
of justification at the last day--The argument that we are
justified in this life in the same manner, and on the same
grounds, as we shall be judged at the last day, that judgement
being according unto works, answered; and the impertinency of
it declared
VII. Imputation, and the nature of it; with the imputation of
the righteousness of Christ in particular Imputation, and
the nature of it--The first express record of justification
determines it to be by imputation, Gen.15:6--Reasons of it--The
doctrine of imputation cleared by Paul; the occasion of it--
Maligned and opposed by many--Weight of the doctrine concerning
imputation of righteousness, on all hands acknowledged--Judgment
of the Reformed churches herein, particularly of the church of
England--By whom opposed, and on what grounds--Signification of
the word--Difference between "reputare" and "imputare"--Imputation
of two kinds:--1. Of what was ours antecedently unto that
imputation, whether good or evil--Instances in both kinds--Nature
of this imputation--The thing imputed by it, imputed for what it is,
and nothing else. --2. Of what is not ours antecedently unto that
imputation, but is made so by it--General nature of this
imputation--Not judging of others to have done what they have
not done--Several distinct grounds and reasons of this
imputation:--1. "Ex justitia"; --(1.) "Propter relationem
foederalem;"--(2.) "Propter relationem naturalem;"--2. "Ex
voluntaria sponsione"--Instances, Philem.18; Gen.43:9--
Voluntary sponsion, the ground of the imputation of sin to
Christ. --3. "Ex injuria", 1 Kings 1:21. --4. "Ex mera
gratia," Rom. 4--Difference between the imputation of any
works of ours, and of the righteousness of God--Imputation of
inherent righteousness is "ex justitia"--Inconsistency of it
with that which is "ex mera gratia," Rom.4--Agreement of both
kinds of imputation--The true nature of the imputation of
righteousness unto justification explained--Imputation of the
righteousness of Christ--The thing itself imputed, not the
effect of it; proved against the Socinians
VIII. Imputation of the sins of the church unto Christ--Grounds
of it--The nature of his suretiship--Causes of the new
covenant--Christ and the church one mystical person--Consequents
thereof Imputation of sin unto Christ--Testimonies of the ancients
unto that purpose--Christ and the church one mystical person--
Mistakes about that state and relation--Grounds and reasons of
the union that is the foundation of this imputation--Christ
the surety of the new covenant; in what sense, unto what ends-
-Heb.7:22, opened--Mistakes about the causes and ends of the
death of Christ--The new covenant, in what sense alone
procured and purchased thereby --Inquiry whether the guilt of
our sins was imputed unto Christ--The meaning of the words,
"guilt," and "guilty"--The distinction of "reatus culpae", and
"reatus poenae", examined--Act of God in the imputation of the
guilt of our sins unto Christ--Objections against it answered-
-The truth confirmed
IX. The formal cause of justification, or the righteousness on
the account whereof believers are justified before God--
Objections answered
Principal controversies about justification:--1. Concerning the
nature of justification, stated--2. Of the formal cause of it-
-3. Of the way whereby we are made partakers of the benefits
of the mediation of Christ--What intended by the formal cause
of justification, declared--The righteousness on the account
whereof believers are justified before God alone, inquired
after under these terms--This the righteousness of Christ,
imputed unto them--Occasions of exceptions and objections
against this doctrine--General objections examined--Imputation
of the righteousness of Christ consistent with the free pardon
of sin, and with the necessity of evangelical repentance--
Method of God's grace in our justification --Necessity of
faith unto justification, on supposition of the imputation of
the righteousness of Christ--Grounds of that necessity--Other
objections, arising mostly from mistakes of the truth,
asserted, discussed, and answered
X. Arguments for justification by the imputation of the
righteousness of Christ.
The first argument from the nature and use of our own personal
righteousness Arguments for justification by the imputation of
the righteousness of Christ--Our own personal righteousness not
that on the account whereof we are justified in the sight of God--
Disclaimed in the Scriptures, as to any such end--The truth
and reality of it granted--Manifold imperfection accompanying
it, rendering it unmeet to be a righteousness unto the
justification of life
XIV. The exclusion of all sorts of works from an interest in
justification--What is intended by "the law," and the
"works" of it, in the epistles of Paul
All works whatever are expressly excluded from any interest
in our justification before God--What intended by the works of
the law--Not those of the ceremonial law only--Not perfect works
only, as required by the law of our creation--Not the outward
works of the law, performed without a principle of faith--Not
works of the Jewish law--Not works with a conceit of merit--
Not works only wrought before believing, in the strength of
our own wills--Works excluded abso1utely from our
justification, without respect unto a distinction of a first
and second justification--The true sense of the law in the
apostolical assertion that none are justified by the works
thereof--What the Jews understood by the law--Distribution of
the law under the Old Testament--The whole law a perfect rule
of all inherent moral or spiritual obedience --What are the
works of the law, declared from the Scripture, and the
argument thereby confirmed --The nature of justifying faith
farther declared
XV. Faith alone
Of faith alone
XVI. The truth pleaded farther confirmed by testimonies of
Scripture.--Jer.23:6
Testimonies of Scripture confirming the doctrine of
justification by the imputation of the righteousness of
Christ--Jer.23:6, exp1sined and indicated
XVII. Testimonies out of the evangelists considered
Testimonies out of the evangelists considered--Design of our
Saviour's sermon on the mount--The purity and penalty of the
law vindicated by him--Arguments from thence--Luke 18:9-14,
the parable of the Pharisee and publican explained and applied
to the present argument--Testimonies out of the gospel by
John, chap. 1:12; 3:14-18, etc.
XVIII. The nature of justification as declared in the epistles
of St. Paul, in that unto the Romans especially.--Chap.
3 [4,5,10; 1 Cor.1:30; 2 Cor.5:21; Gal.2:16; Eph.2:8-10;
Phil.3:8,9.]
Testimonies out of the Epistles of Paul the apostle--His design
in the fifth chapter to the Romans--That design explained at
large, and applied to the present argument--Chap.3:24-26
explained, and the true sense of the words vindicated--The
causes of justification enumerated--Apostolical inference from
the consideration of them--Chap.4, design of the disputation
of the apostle therein Analysis of his discourse--Verses 4, 5,
particularly insisted on; their true sense vindicated--What
works excluded from the justification of Abraham--Who it is
that works not--In what sense the ungodly are justified--All
men ungodly antecedently unto their justification--Faith alone
the means of justification on our part--Faith itself,
absolutely considered, not the righteousness that is imputed
unto us--Proved by sundry arguments Rom.5:l2-21--Boasting excluded
in ourselves, asserted in God--The design and sum of the apostle's
argument--Objection of Socinus removed--Comparison between the two
Adams, and those that derive from them--Sin entered into the world --
What sin intended--Death, what it comprises, what intended by
it--The sense of these words, "inasmuch," or, "in whom all have
sinned," cleared and vindicated--The various oppositions used
by the apostle in this discourse: principally between sin or
the fall, and the free gift; between the disobedience of the
one, and the obedience of another; judgment on the one hand,
and justification unto life on the other--The whole context at
large explained, and the argument for justification by the
imputation of the righteousness of Christ, fully confirmed
Rom.10:3,4, explained and insisted on to the same purpose
1 Cor.1:30--Christ, how of God made righteousness unto us--
Answer of Bellarmine unto this testimony removed--That of
Socinus disproved--True sense of the words evinced 2 Cor.5:21--
In what sense Christ knew no sin--Emphasis in that expression--
How he was made sin for us--By the imputation of sin unto him--
Mistakes of some about this expression--Sense of the ancients--
Exception of Bellarmine unto this testimony answered, with other
reasonings of his to the same purpose--The exceptions of others
also removed Gal.2:16 Eph.2:8-10--Evidence of this testimony--
Design of the apostle from the beginning of the chapter--Method
of the apostle in the declaration of the grace of God--Grace
alone the cause of deliverance from a state of sin--Things to
be observed in the assignation of the causes of spiritual
deliverances--Grace, how magnified by him--Force of the argument
and evidence from thence--State of the case here proposed by
the apostle--General determination of it, "By grace are ye
saved"--What is it to be saved, inquired into--The same as to
be justified, but not exclusively--The causes of our
justification declared positively and negatively--The whole
secured unto the grace of God by Christ, and our interest
therein through faith alone--Works excluded--What works?--Not
works of the law of Moses--Not works antecedent unto believing--
Works of true believers--Not only in opposition to the grace
of God, but to faith in us--Argument from those words--Reason
whereon this exclusion of works is founded--To exclude boasting
on our part--Boasting, wherein it consists--Inseparable from
the interest of works in justification--Danger of it--
Confirmation of this reason, obviating an objection--The objection
stated--If we be not justified by works, of what use are they?
answered Phil.3:8,9--Heads of argument from this testimony--
Design of the context--Righteousness the foundation of acceptance
with God--A twofold righteousness considered by the apostle--
Opposite unto one another, as unto the especial and inquired
after--Which of these he adhered unto, his own righteousness, or
the righteousness of God; declared by the apostle with vehemency
of speech--Reasons of his earnestness herein--The turning
point whereon he left Judaism--The opposition made unto this
doctrine by the Jews--The weight of the doctrine, and
unwillingness of men to receive it--His own sense of sin and
grace--Peculiar expressions used in this place, for the
reasons mentioned, concerning Christ; concerning all things
that are our own--The choice to be made on the case stated,
whether we will adhere unto our own righteousness, or that of
Christ's, which are inconsistent as to the end of
justification--Argument from this place--Exceptions unto this
testimony, and argument from thence, removed--Our personal
righteousness inherent, the same with respect unto the law and
gospel --External righteousness only required by the law, an
impious imagination--Works wrought before faith only rejected-
-The exception removed--Righteousness before conversion, not
intended by the apostle
XIX. Objections against the doctrine of justification by the
imputation of the righteousness of Christ--Personal holiness
and obedience not obstructed, but furthered by it
Objections against the doctrine of justification by the imputation
of the righteousness of Christ--Nature of these objections--
Difficulty in discerning aright the sense of some men in this
argument--Justification by works, the end of all declension
from the righteousness of Christ--Objections against this
doctrine derived from a supposition thereof alone--First
principal objection: Imputed righteousness overthrows the
necessity of a holy life--This objection, as managed by them
of the church of Rome, an open calumny--How insisted on by
some among ourselves--Socinus' fierceness in this charge--His
foul dishonesty therein--False charges on men's opinions
making way for the rash condemnation of their persons--
Iniquity of such censures--The objection rightly stated--
Sufficiently answered in the previous discourses about the
nature of faith, and force of the moral law--The nature and
necessity of evangelical holiness elsewhere pleaded--
Particular answers unto this objection--All who profess this
doctrine do not exemplify it in their lives--The most holy
truths have been abused--None by whom this doctrine is now
denied exceeds them in holiness by whom it is formerly
professed, and the power of it attested--The contrary doctrine
not successful in the reformation of the lives of men--The
best way to determine this difference--The one objection
managed against the doctrine of the apostle in his own days--
Efficacious prejudices against this doctrine in the minds of
men--The whole doctrine of the apostle liable to be abused--
Answer of the apostle unto this objection--He never once
attempts to answer it by declaring the necessity of personal
righteousness, or good works, unto justification before God--
He confines the cogency of evangelical motives unto obedience
only unto believers--Grounds of evangelical holiness asserted
by him, in compliance with his doctrine of justification:--1
Divine ordination--Exceptions unto this ground removed--2.
Answer of the apostle vindicated--The obligation of the law
unto obedience--Nature of it, and consistency with grace--This
answer of the apostle vindicated--Heads of other principles
that might be pleaded to the same purpose
XX. The doctrine of the apostle James concerning faith and works--
Its agreement with that of St Paul
Seeming difference, no real contradiction, between the apostles
Paul and James, concerning justification--This granted by all-
-Reasons of the seeming difference--The best rule of the
interpretation of places of Scripture wherein there is an
appearing repugnancy--The doctrine of justification according
unto that rule principally to be learned from the writings of
Paul--The reasons of his fulness and accuracy in the teaching
(continued in part 2...)
----------------------------------------------------
file: /pub/resources/text/ipb-e/epl-02: ownjs-01.txt
.